Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Scouting on or off?

  1. #1

    Scouting on or off?

    ...Just read where if scouting is "ON" each team gets an inaccurate scouting report based on the color of their socks, and the height of the CF fence, or something like that, but if scouting is "OFF", (which we have to specially request), then each team gets 100% accuracy. Currently, our league scouting is "ON", so reports cannot be trusted... Should we go to "OFF"?
    ...I suppose that "on" represents having a somewhat flaky cousin doing the reports, while "off" is the latest 'Billy Ball" computerized accuracy...
    ...Anyway, however it comes about:
    ...Scouting... "ON" or "OFF" ?

    joebaseball

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    23,449

    Re: Scouting on or off?

    I'm going to vote for Scouting On, the idea that scouting is a guess, and as players age the scouting becomes more accurate (also at that point have actual results) seems like a challenge I am willing to do
    Fighting Physicists - The Classic League
    "All science is either physics or stamp collecting." -Ernest Rutherford


  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by joebaseball View Post
    ...Just read where if scouting is "ON" each team gets an inaccurate scouting report based on the color of their socks, and the height of the CF fence, or something like that, but if scouting is "OFF", (which we have to specially request), then each team gets 100% accuracy. Currently, our league scouting is "ON", so reports cannot be trusted... Should we go to "OFF"?
    ...I suppose that "on" represents having a somewhat flaky cousin doing the reports, while "off" is the latest 'Billy Ball" computerized accuracy...
    ...Anyway, however it comes about:
    ...Scouting... "ON" or "OFF" ?

    joebaseball
    I'm for scouting On also...

  4. #4

    Re: Scouting on or off?

    ...As an example, in one league I'm in when scouting was the old way last season, there were two FA's that came in over 4 mil before bidding. My scouting at the time was 10/10, so I had the best scouts in the business... Neither player had a stat over 78, most in the mid 60's to 70's. I thought at the tine their salary "demands" were ridiculous. They should have come in at 1.5 or so at most with those numbers. So far, that has proven true. One is making 6 mil, and batting .238 with 5 Hrs in 80+ games... The other is making 4.6 mil, batting .245 with 8 HRs and 17 rbi in 51 games. He was released after a handful of games by the original bidder, then resigned by another team.
    ...Point being that specific scouting on a team by team basis can make all the difference when signing FA's or drafting players. I view the Scouting "off" as all teams belonging to the same scouting service. 100% accuracy. A level playing field. Scouting "On" is no longer controllable by adjusting team money, so, I mistrust its basis for accuracy on any individual team. Had I not had my scouting at 10/10 in that league, then I might have been drawn into a big error, as were other owners that year.
    ...Can anyone provide the criteria for how Scouting "On" actually works for individual teams? I also wonder how "Player Development" and "Longevity" is decided now that teams cannot adjust these for themselves...

    joebaseball
    Last edited by joebaseball; Yesterday at 10:49 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •